Wet Ink or E-Signature? Signing Your Discovery Answers in California
If you are in a lawsuit in California, the other side will probably send you written questions and requests. Lawyers call this "discovery." Your answers have to come with a signed statement, swearing that the answers are true. Lawyers call that signed statement a "verification."
Today, most people sign documents with a click or a tap. You e-sign apartment leases, car loans, and job forms all the time. So you might assume you can e-sign your discovery verification too. That assumption could cause you real trouble.
Why the Signature Matters
California law requires you to sign your discovery answers "under oath." (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.250, 2031.250, 2033.240.) In the old days, that meant standing in front of a notary and swearing to tell the truth.
Another law, Code of Civil Procedure section 2015.5, gives you an easier option. You can skip the notary if you write "I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct" and then "subscribe" the statement. If you lie in a signed declaration like that, you can face criminal charges for perjury. That threat is the whole point. It pushes people to tell the truth.
So the key question becomes: what does "subscribe" mean?
What the Courts Have Said
The California Supreme Court defined "subscribe" in 1967 by quoting a dictionary. The definition included "to write (as one's name) underneath" and "to sign with one's own hand." (People v. Pierce (1967) 66 Cal.2d 53, 59, fn. 5.)
Later courts relied on that definition. In one case, a lawyer signed her client's name on sworn declarations. She had read the declarations with the client first, and the client said yes. The Court of Appeal still called her practice "completely improper." (In re Marriage of Reese & Guy (1999) 73 Cal.App.4th 1214, 1222.) The court explained that if the client later says "I never agreed to that," the lawyer ends up as the main witness against her own client. Another court put it simply: a lawyer "may not verify by signing the client's name." (Blum v. Superior Court (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 418, 427.)
These cases teach one clear lesson. The person swearing to the truth has to sign personally. Nobody else can sign for them, even with permission.
What About E-Signatures?
This part gets trickier, because no published California appellate case directly answers whether an e-signature counts on a discovery verification. Trial judges have reached different results.
Some judges have rejected e-signed verifications because "subscribe" means signing with your own hand. Other judges have accepted e-signatures by relying on a law called the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, or UETA. (Civ. Code, § 1633.1 et seq.) UETA says an electronic signature usually counts whenever a law requires a signature.
UETA has limits, though. It only covers "transactions," meaning dealings between two or more people involving business, commercial, or government affairs. (Civ. Code, § 1633.2, subd. (o).) It also only applies when both sides agree to do business electronically. (Civ. Code, § 1633.5, subd. (b).) A discovery verification looks nothing like a business deal. It is one person swearing that their own answers are true. A California appeals court has already held that UETA does not cover one-sided acts like that. (Trotter v. Trotter Van Dyck (2024) 103 Cal.App.5th 126.)
The California Legislature and the Judicial Council did create rules allowing e-signatures on sworn documents, but only for documents a party files with the court. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1010.6; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2.257.) Parties do not file discovery answers with the court. They send them to the other side. So those e-signature rules arguably do not help you.
Why This Can Hurt You
If a judge decides your e-signature does not count, the court treats your answers as unverified. Unverified answers can count as no answers at all. That can lead to a motion to compel, money sanctions against you, and in the case of requests for admission, a real risk that the court treats key facts as admitted against you. A few seconds saved with a click could cost you hundreds or thousands of dollars.
Our Advice
Until an appellate court settles this question, play it safe:
Sign your discovery verifications by hand, in ink. Your lawyer can mail, email, or hand you the verification page. Print it, sign it, and return the original.
Never let anyone else sign for you. Not your lawyer, not a paralegal, not a family member. The courts have made this rule very clear.
Keep your original signed page. If the other side challenges your signature, your lawyer can produce it.
If the other side e-signs their verifications, talk to your lawyer. You may have grounds to demand properly verified answers.
A wet-ink signature takes a few extra minutes. It removes an argument the other side could otherwise use against you.
This article provides general information, not legal advice. Every case is different. If you have questions about discovery in your own case, contact the Law Offices of David Kestner & Associates, APC, at (888) 898-7322 or info@kestner.lawyer.
Comments